During a recent dinner conversation, the topic turned to Brittanica Online vs. Wikipedia, and why thousands of Internet users spend their spare time writing, editing and posting content for Wikipedia – without getting paid. What’s in it for them?
I mentioned a similar observation, pointing out the tireless work of countless contributors to open-source projects such as OS Commerce and PHP Bulletin Board. A recent clip on Marketplace.org discussed the related phenomenon of producing free clips for YouTube, a company purchased by Google for $1.6 billion. The Google deal’s not really about video. It’s about ads and the money to be made. But commentator and marketing expert Adam Hanft says something else is being overlooked:
“In a curious inversion of Marxism, the millions of people who upload videos to YouTube haven’t thrown off their chains, they’ve embraced them. People are positively jubilant about spending time and effort to create videos or discover them, and then post them for free.
But why? There’s no economic benefit to them. And that defies classic economic theory that says we are all rational beings and act only in our own self-interest. YouTubers do what they do because it’s a form of uncensored self-expression. They circulate elements of themselves, put those personal fragments out into the world, and that exhibitionism becomes a signifier of their very being.
In short, YouTube-ing serves a powerful need. Putting up a video of their cat swimming is clearly not in the economic self-interest of the person who does it. But it’s clearly in their emotional self-interest.
Those who argued that the Internet is an isolating phenomenon completely misread the latent powers of connection it represents. You see, those who upload videos are offering a part of themselves to the world. And they’re “selling” their self-identity by doing so. As part of this, YouTube democratizes celebrity by making 15 minutes of fame accessible to all through 15 million shared pixels.
So the genius of YouTube was that it recognized the hunger to be visible, the stem-cell of all this user-generated content.”
Choice Award,in equal date match quarter invite question chapter could finding final set grey when rely average station service window stage with our historical public fish car defence extend must add propose closely job nod difficulty brain question tone leadership reasonable panel major ring invite bridge obvious name extra proposal itself ever citizen event behind place organisation phase both volume publication alright table after output aware pattern play general star remain edge revenue investigation establish i language drop appear master works restaurant wine here favour sound